Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Vaughn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1990No. 8918DC1219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b) provides in pertinent part that

[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

H* H* *(4) The judgment is void[.]

“[A] motion for relief under Rule 60(b) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and appellate review is limited to determining whether the Court abused its discretion.” Sink v. Easter, 288 N.C. 183, 198, 217 S.E.2d 532, 541 (1975).

Notwithstanding the parties’ arguments regarding the requirement that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. In Re BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Moss v. Improved Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the WorldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. St. Regis of Onslow County v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Parris v. LightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Barton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API