Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1924PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRttgg, C.J.

This is an action of tort by a passenger to recover compensation for personal injuries received while riding upon a car of the defendant. There are two counts in the plaintiff’s declaration. It is alleged in the first count that the plaintiff slipped by reason of the negligence of the defendant in allowing a greatly discolored portion of an apple to remain in the aisle of the car. The only evidence tending to support this allegation was the testimony of the plaintiff to this effect: “ I got on the car at the corner of Washington Street and Columbia Road ... I took a seat *363and I was nearing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Work v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Foley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Newell v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Hudson v. F. W. Woodworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API