Attorney Grievance Commission v. Usiak
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-715, 1 the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Norman C. Usiak (“Respondent”), charging him with professional misconduct arising out of his representation of Ruben Paz-Rubio in the District Court of Maryland, sitting in Frederick County. Petitioner charged Respondent with violating Rule 8.4(d) (Misconduct) 2 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”). In accordance with Maryland Rule 16-752(a) 3 , we referred the matter to the Honorable Durke…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DunietzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Heung Sik ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KhandpurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.