Daraxa Lee Mattice, by and Through Her Guardians Ad Litem, Gregory G. Mattice and June Mattice v. United States of America, Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Daraxa Mattice, by and through her guardians ad litem, appeals from summary judgment, 752 F.Supp. 905, and dismissal of her action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (1988). She seeks damages for personal injuries sustained when she drove off a national park road and dropped 350 feet to the beach below. We *820hold that summary judgment was' proper because the United States was protected by California’s recreational use statute.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 1987, 14 year old Mat-tice was congregating with friends at the Crescent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Abex Corporation v. Ski's Enterprises, Inc. And United States of America v. Walton Shim and Sandra ShimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilcox v. CSX Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Szewczyk v. WojtaszekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Cleveland v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Manuel v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.