Legal Opinion

State v. Engelmann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1995No. 19020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

Defendant moved before sentencing to withdraw his guilty plea to second degree rape. Finding the circuit court’s denial of the motion an abuse of discretion, we reverse and remand.

Facts

Gary George Engelmann, a physician at Hand County Clinic in Miller, South Dakota, frequently performed gynecological examinations. On July 1,1994, during a pelvic exam, a patient ran out of Engelmann’s examining room to seek help from other members of the clinic staff. She accused him of raping her. In the resulting investigation, the State learned of several more female patients with similar…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Milton L. KobroskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. United States v. David K. Buckley, David K. Buckley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BaileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. IrvineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Legrand v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API