McKinney v. Lanning
Indiana Supreme Court
From tlie Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
The complaint in this action is in three paragraphs.
The first is in the usual form for an action in ejectment.
The second, also, seeks to recover the land in dispute and to quiet the plaintiffs’ title thereto and to recover damages for its detention. It sets out the facts fully, and alleges that the ground in controversy was conveyed to defendants’ grantors for a special purpose, and that there was an easement or right to use and enjoy the land for certain privileges reserved to the original grantor, who was then the owner of the lands described in this paragraph, and which easement or right…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Simpson v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Cook v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Chaplin v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Booker v. TarwaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. TishnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- McLucas v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Greif v. TeasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Baugh v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Donner v. GriffithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.