Legal Opinion

Chaplin v. Baker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1890No. 14,136PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

This was an action upon a note, and to foreclose a mortgage.

The complaint alleges that the appellants, John Chaplin, Frank Gillett, and Caroline Gillett, on the 23d day of July, *3861884, executed their joint and several promissory note to the appellee for the sum of $376, and to secure the same the said appellants on the same day executed a mortgage on the real estate therein described; that there remains due and unpaid on the note the sum of $210, and attorney’s fees; that after the execution of said mortgage, one Emma Sullivan, who is. made a party defendant, became the owner of said real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Simpson v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Cook v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Field v. NoblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Masons' Union Life Insurance v. BrockmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Russell v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Fuelling v. FuesseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API