Legal Opinion
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Benson
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The facts stated in the stipulation constitute the findings of fact in this ease. Briefly stated, the essential facts are these:
Elmer C. Benson was, at the time of his death, the holder of a beneficiary certificate of the plaintiff issued to him on December 29J 1916. The certificate recited that he was a member of Spokane Lodge No. 307, and was “entitled to all the rights, privileges, and benefits of membership, and to participate in the beneficiary department Class B of said Brotherhood to the amount set forth in the Constitution thereof,” which in the event of his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fink v. . FinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Delaney v. DelaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Shuman v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doering v. BuechlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Carroll v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Boyd v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Southern Lumber Co. v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Will & Appointment of Estate of Kipke v. KipkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.