Legal Opinion

Southern Lumber Co. v. Pearce

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1932No. 6483PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Mrs. Pearce, beneficiary in a life insurance policy for $5,000, brought this suit in a state court of Alabama against the New York Life Insurance Company to recover thereon; The cause removed to the federal court; the company, by way of interpleader in accordance' with section 10386 of the statutes of Alabama (Code 1923), paid the amount sued’ for into court, suggesting that without collusion with it the Southern Lumber Company was a claimant for said sum. Mrs. Pearce and the lumber company each filing claim to the amount, one as beneficiary, the other as assignee,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  3. Anderson v. Broad Street National BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  4. Douglass v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Modern Woodmen of America v. HeadleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mrs. Josie S. Rochelle, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Giles M. Rochelle, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mrs. Josie S. Rochelle, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Giles M. Rochelle, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  3. Southern Lumber Co. v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API