Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Griffin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.

Motion for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff sues his wife for an annulment of the marriage. The parties were married in 1906. There are two children, now aged fifteen and six. An analysis of a rather verbose complaint indicates the cause of action the plaintiff seeks to state *838to be that prior to and at the time of the marriage defendant represented to plaintiff that she loved and honored him and would love, honor and serve him after marriage; that as a matter of fact she did not prior to, at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Fisk v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Domschke v. DomschkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feig v. FeigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Amsden v. AmsdenNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Croce v. CroceNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jennings v. JenningsNew York Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API