Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Peter Evanchik, Howard John Critzman, Carl Pugliese, and Thomas Sobeck
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 16, 1969No. 32841-32844_1PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Evanchik, Critzman and Pugliese were convicted on two counts, and appellant Sobeck on one count, upon a trial by jury, of knowingly transporting stolen goods in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 (1964), as amended (Supp. IV 1965-1968). We have considered the many assignments of error that have been advanced by appellants and have found no ground for reversal. The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
The relevant counts of the indictment 1 charge that appellants and several code-fendants knowingly transported goods of a value in excess of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Francis J. De SistoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Robert L. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Peter SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Joseph RuggieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.