Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Rohan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1947No. 30316PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is an appeal by appellants, Rohan, (default judgment having been entered against defendant Denzler), from a judgment foreclosing a claim of lien and awarding judgment against appellants in the sum of $1,237.22, together with attorneys’ fees and costs, including title search fees, and other incidentals.

Respondent, Kirk, is a builder and contractor, working mostly for insurance companies in the city of Tacoma. He and Mr. Rohan met through mutual friends. Rohan wanted a garage built, and it was agreed that Kirk would do the work on a force account basis — that is, time and material— rather…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bradley v. Donovan-Pattison Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Pacific Manufacturing Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Osten v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gene McVety, Inc. v. Don Grady Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Friis v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brashear Electric, Inc. v. Norcal Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API