Legal Opinion

Osten v. Curtis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1925No. 18912. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

plaintiff, Osten, commenced this action in the superior court for King county seeking recovery for labor and material furnished by him to the defendant, Mrs. Curtis, in the repair of an old dwelling house belonging to her; and also to have the amount due him therefor decreed to be a lien upon the property. A trial resulted in a decree awarding recovery and foreclosure as prayed for by Osten, from which Mrs. Curtis has appealed to this court.

No formal findings of fact were made by the trial judge. It, however, is apparent from the record that he Mewed the facts in substance as follows: The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. ClowardUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Petro Paint Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Rose v. O'ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Swensson v. CarltonWashington Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API