Altschul v. Sayble
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Attorney John A. Altschul appeals from the summary judgment granted in an action brought by Altschul against Attorney Hill Sayble wherein appellant sought to recover money allegedly owed by respondent pursuant to said attorneys’ fee-splitting/referral fee agreement. The trial court held that the contract was against public policy and unenforceable.
Facts:
On March 24, 1971, appellant informed respondent that one of appellant’s divorce clients, Robert E. Smith, had been injured in a motorcycle accident. Appellant asked respondent to represent Smith in connection with his personal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Retail Clerks International Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Beynon v. Garden Grove Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.