Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronn Darnell Sterling

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 21, 2013No. 12-12255PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RESTANI, Judge:

Defendants-Appellants Ronn Sterling (“Sterling”) and Cornell Brumfield (“Brumfield”) appeal their convictions for armed bank robbery, use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Sterling argues that his right to be present at trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43 was violated, and both defendants argue that evidence of their prior convictions was inadmissible. Additionally, Brumfield argues that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty on the gun charge. The district court found that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. BenabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Christopher Cantu v. City of Dothan, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Aumbrey WinsteadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Airiz ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API