Legal Opinion

United States v. Airiz Coleman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2017No. 16-3972PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Airiz Coleman (Coleman) was convicted by a jury of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, he faults the district court for failing to order sua sponte a mental competency evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a). We find no error and affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Pretrial Filings and Proceedings

On November 17, 2015, Defendant pointed a gun at Garry Valentine (Valentine), a recovery agent with a vehicle repossession company, and threatened to shoot him. As a result, he was indicted on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Donte TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Ryan LuscombeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. William PrigmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. SoFi Lending Corp. v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Wilmington Savs. Fund Soc., FSB v. CordeliaOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API