Legal Opinion

Pendleton v. Hare

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 232-3413PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Sixth Supreme Judicial District. Suit by W. S. Pendleton against Silas Hare, administrator of Samuel Bailey. A judgment for plaintiff was reversed by tbe Court of Civil Appeals (214 S. W. 948), judgment being rendered for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Plaintiff in error, W. A. Pendleton, instituted this suit against Silas Hare, administrator of the estate of Samuel Bailey, to recover the value of attorney’s fees for services rendered the estate in Oklahoma.

The facts necessary to a determination of the issues are:

That Samuel Bailey died in Pottawatomie county, the place of his residence, leaving a will in which B. F. Hamilton was named executor and Sherman Spencer the sole beneficiary.

The estate consisted of real and personal property situated in Oklahoma of the value of $6,000 and personal property in Texas consisting of $54,000 on deposit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stacy v. Thrasher Ex Rel. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Henderson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. William J. McLean v. James L. MeekSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Hill v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Gilroy v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. W. T. Huff. v. J. H. Huff, Admstr.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Duehay v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Salmon v. SalmonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lang v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Richardson v. McCloskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API