T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc. v. Preletz
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
Presently before this Court is a motion by defendants to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and venue or, alternatively, to transfer this action. Also before this Court is a motion by defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The issues have been fully briefed. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6.
FACTS
The Complaint in this case alleges that Defendants, Michael O. Preletz and Robert L. Deinhammer, executive officers of ADAC…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robert Schaefer and Sandra Schaefer v. First National Bank of LincolnwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Deltona Corp. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Klein v. Computer Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Verifone Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- In Re Stratosphere Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. KapoorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.