Legal Opinion
Civil Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 24, 1971No. 71-C-1232PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
TRAVIA, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Civil Aeronautics Board (“CAB”), is seeking injunctive relief restraining the defendants, certain travel agencies and certain named individuals associated therewith, from engaging in certain business practices alleged to be violative of the Federal Aviation Program. The defendants move for various types of relief, including dismissal of the complaint.
The complaint alleges that jurisdiction is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 49 U.S.C. § 1487. (Jurisdictional issues will be discussed infra, in connection with the question of venue),
The defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. McLucasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- Civil, Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In re Camco Patent Infringement LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972