Legal Opinion
Civil, Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1972No. 71-C-1232PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TRAVIA, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Civil Aeronautics Board [hereinafter CAB], instituted this action to enjoin and restrain the defendants, certain travel agencies and certain named individuals associated therewith, from engaging in specific activities as “indirect air carriers and indirect foreign air carriers.” See Title 49 U.S.C. § 1301(3), (19).1 In addition, the CAB requested the enforcement of a cease and desist order, issued by the CAB on June 23, 1971. That order, docket numbers 22307 and 22311, was issued against Charter Consultants, Inc., and Fred Meyrow,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Sudflug Suddeutsche Fluggesellschaft Mbh, Intervenor. Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Robert T. Murphy, Sudflug Suddeutsche Fluggesellschaft Mbh, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Graphic Scanning Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Aeromatic Travel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974