Pool v. Burlison
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Frank Kevin Pool, appeals the dismissal of his petition for legal malpractice against defendant, Rex Burlison, for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
In reviewing the dismissal in this case, we accept as true the facts as pleaded and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom. Lynn v. TI.M.E. — D.C., Inc., 710 S.W.2d 359, 360 (Mo.App.1986). If, viewed in this manner, the allegations invoke substantive principles of law, which if proved may entitle the pleader to relief, the petition should not be dismissed. Id.
The facts gleaned from plaintiff’s pro se petition are as follows:…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hazen v. PasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Lynn v. T.I.M.E.-D.C., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fischer v. VonckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boatright v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Suelthaus & Kaplan, P.C. v. Byron Oil Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cain v. WebsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Litigation Lawyers, Professional Association v. HarbisonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025