Legal Opinion

Cain v. Webster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1989No. 15585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

By his petition the plaintiff, John W. Cain, seeks to recover damages from lawyers Richard Webster and William Webster because they did not represent him in a proceeding in which his Missouri license as a podiatrist was revoked. He also seeks to recover from lawyers Richard J. Collins and David W. Kinnard as associates of the Websters on the basis of vicarious liability. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Discovery, including depositions of the plaintiff and the two Websters, was had. The trial court treated the motion as a motion for summary judgment. Following a hearing, it sustained…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Marriage of Cain v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Hill v. Air Shields, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Landmark North County Bank & Trust Co. v. National Cable Training Centers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cain v. Buehner and BuehnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Viehweg v. MelloDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
  3. Arvin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Cain v. State Board of PodiatryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Babcock v. KTVI-TV, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API