Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Humphrey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 2012No. 2006AP2842-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Paul W Humphrey appeals a report and recommendation filed by Referee Russell Hanson, recommending a public reprimand based on the referee's conclusion that Attorney Humphrey committed professional misconduct in his handling of a criminal prosecution. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that Attorney Humphrey's misconduct warrants a 30-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin along with the imposition of the full costs of this proceeding.
¶ 2. Attorney Humphrey was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1989. He has no prior attorney disciplinary history…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Thompson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against SwartwoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SommersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Toran (In Re Toran)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Samuel Curtis Johnson, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.