Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Toran (In Re Toran)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2018No. 2016AP000112-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 Attorney James Toran appeals a report filed by Referee John A. Fiorenza concluding that Attorney Toran committed three counts of professional misconduct and recommending that Attorney Toran should be ordered to pay restitution and that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for one year. Attorney Toran entered into a stipulation whereby he admitted to the alleged misconduct and agrees to pay restitution. He argues that a lesser sanction is warranted.

¶2 We adopt the referee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation regarding restitution, but we conclude that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ListerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SommersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. LueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. LueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API