Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Bronson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 3, 1997No. 96-0035PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

685 So.2d 994 (1997)

Pamela BRONSON, Cross Appellee,

v.

Donald BRONSON, etc. et al., Cross Appellant.

No. 96-0035.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 3, 1997.

No Appearance for Cross Appellee.

Jerri A. Blair and Kimberly M. Reid of Blair & Reid, Tavares, for Cross Appellant.

ANTOON, Judge.

Donald Bronson (defendant) cross appeals the denial of his claim for attorney's fees incurred in successfully defending against Pamela Bronson's (plaintiff) claim for civil theft.[1] We reverse because the trial court erroneously applied the frivolous suit standard in denying the request for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreman v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Ciaramello v. D'AmbraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Friedman v. LAUDERDALE MEDICAL EQUIP. SERVICE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haas v. RoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Montgomery & Larmoyeux v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  3. Standafer v. SchallerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Dictiomatic, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
  5. EATON v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API