Legal Opinion
Haas v. Roe
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 27, 1997No. 97-00143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
696 So.2d 1254 (1997)
Raymond A. HAAS, Appellant,
v.
Michael ROE and Joseph Patsko, Appellees.
No. 97-00143.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 27, 1997.
Rehearing Denied July 24, 1997.
Kevin H. O'Neill of Haas, Ramey & Beik, Tampa, for Appellant.
Joseph T. Patsko and Michael A. Roe, pro se.
2Per curiam
This case arises from a dispute among the shareholders of the law firm Haas, Austin, Ley, Roe & Patsko, Inc. (the firm). Events occurring after the first dismissal with leave to amend of the appellant's multi-count complaint form the basis of this appeal. The two judgments under review award…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- SLT Warehouse Company v. WebbSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- McGurn v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Winkelman v. TollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Muckenfuss v. Deltona CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- McHale v. GrobowskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- D. Bruce McMahan v. William A. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- D. Bruce McMahan v. William A. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- McMonigle v. McMonigleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Palawski v. Riviera Southshore VenturesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007