Legal Opinion

Standafer v. Schaller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1999No. 98-00516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULMER, Judge.

Appellants W. Scott Standafer and James Czachowski raise several issues challenging the determination, in a jury trial, that appel-lee Fred Schaller was not liable for negligent misrepresentation or civil theft in the sale of a rare gold coin to Standafer and Czachow-ski. We find merit only in the challenge to the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Schaller under the ciyil theft statute, section 772.11, Florida Statutes (1997).

The trial court awarded attorney’s fees to Schaller based on its finding that “the jury did not find by clear and convincing evidence that Schaller…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bronson v. BronsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. Allen Holmes, Inc. v. Jim Molter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. DARIO AYALA, individually, and INRI INC., d/b/a ARMS INTL v. INTERAVIA SPARES AND SERVICES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  3. Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy Michael ChiassonFlorida Fourth District Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API