Ridley v. State

Appellant was found guilty, in a non-jury trial, of breaking and entering a warehouse with intent to steal property therefrom feloniously (Code [1961 Supp.], Art. 27, Sec. 32), and, after receiving a ten-year sentence, has appealed.

He raises two contentions: (1) insufficiency of the evidence of 'felonious intent, and to establish that he broke into the premises; and (2) the sentence imposed was not proper. Neither contention presents anything new, and both are unsubstantial.

The evidence, and rational inferences therefrom, disclose: that the warehouse was securely locked by the manager of its…