Legal Opinion
People v. Kahn
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1936No. Cr. A. 1331PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Appellant was convicted, by his plea of guilty, of selling a six-pound can of Crisco at less than cost for the purpose of injuring his competitors and destroying competition. From the judgment fining him $500 and im posing a six months’ term of imprisonment (suspended), he has appealed, contending that the provisions of the statute passed to make his act a public offense (see. 3, Unfair Practices Act, Stats. 1935, p. 1546) are unconstitutional. With this contention we do not agree; we are of the opinion .that the judgment should be affirmed.
Section 3 of the Unfair Practices Act reads as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Lane Distributors, Inc. v. TiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.