Legal Opinion

Overton v. Alford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1954No. 18570PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The petition of the plaintiff shall plainly, fully, and distinctly set forth his cause of action for either legal or equitable relief, or both. Code § 81-101.

“ 'It is “one of the fundamental rules of pleading that facts and not legal conclusions must be alleged,” and that mere general conclusions without specific facts on which they are based will constitute no cause of action. [Authorities].’ It is the facts alleged, and not the conclusions, that determine whether or not a cause of action is stated.” Forrester v. Edwards, 192 Ga. 529, 534 (15 S. E. 2d 851), and cases cited;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Fowler v. Southern Airlines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Nance v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. William Hone & Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tri-County Electric Ass'n, Inc. v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Westpark Walk Owners, LLC v. Stewart Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Brown v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Floyd County v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Knowles v. GwynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API