Legal Opinion

Nance v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1936No. 11386PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

We find no sufficient statement of facts to warrant any action by the court in the plaintiffs’ favor. Assuming that.we should take judicial cognizance of the proclamation of the Governor, as the plaintiff alleges we may and should do, we still have before us a petition in which, so far as unlawful acts are concerned, it is alleged only that the petitioners are informed and believe that the defendant expects to pay out the public funds of the State in accordance with the proclamation of the Governor, and that “in many respects it appears from said proclamation the *540payments therein ordered to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Everett v. TaborSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. State v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  3. Quinn v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. McGehee v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Peoples Loan Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Peoples Loan Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Bowers v. DolanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API