Legal Opinion

Bristow v. Mourot

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided August 29, 2007No. CA 06-1419Published

1Opinion of the Court

David M. Glover, Judge.

The trial court, sitting as fact-finder, ruled that appellee Randy Mourot did not violate the Arkansas Securities Act and therefore owed no damages to appellants. We affirm.

In 1997, Mourot decided to sell his company, Mail Contractors of America. He asked several members of his management team, including appellants, to assist him with presentations for prospective buyers. In return, he promised them a “transaction bonus” equivalent to a year’s salary when the company sold.

After several presentations were made, Mourot decided to sell to Code, Hennessey, & Simmons, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Segal v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hogg v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Boland v. HammondOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. McNamara v. BohnCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API