Legal Opinion
James Julian, Inc. of Delaware v. Testerman
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 18, 1999No. 98A-05-002-HLAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALFORD, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On October 4, 1995, Gary Testerman (“Testerman”) was fatally injured while employed with James Julian, Inc. of Delaware (“Julian”). His widow, Nora Tester-man, filed a Petition for Compensation Due on September 22, 1997, requesting death benefits under Delaware’s Workers’ Compensation Statute. A hearing on the Petition was held before the Industrial Accident Board (“Board”) on April 2, 1998. The sole issue before the Board was whether Testerman was in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident. On April 15, the Board issued a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Stoltz Management Co. v. Consumer Affairs BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Battista v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. FaupelSuperior Court of Delaware · 2004
- Nathanial Raiford v. Amy Anthony, Director of Division of Motor VehiclesDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2024