Legal Opinion

E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Faupel

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 2004No. C.A. 03A-04-014-RRCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOCH, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an appeal of a decision of the Industrial Accident Board (“LAB”) holding that Barbara Faupel’s (“Faupel”) injury, Guillain-Barré Syndrome/chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, which resulted from an influenza vaccination administered to her by her employer E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co. (“DuPont”), was within the course and scope of her employment and therefore compensa-ble under the Workers’ Compensation Act. This Court finds that there was substantial evidence to support the IAB’s decision and affirms the decision of the Board. This Court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  5. Chudnofsky v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rolsen v. Walgreen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Angelo v. New Castle County Board of Assessment ReviewSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Burroughs v. Kent County Assessment OfficeSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  4. Larry Driscoll v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026
  5. Robert LaRue v. Evraz Claymont SteelSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API