Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Junction City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1926No. 27,212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs sued to enjoin the defendants from extending the corporate limits of Junction City so as to include real property owned by them. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.

It is argued that the ordinance extending the corporate limits so as to include the property owned by the plaintiffs is invalid because the property had not been platted into lots and blocks, was not circumscribed by territory within the corporate limits, and because no petition had ever been presented to the county…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Bowlus v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Olsson v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Stewart v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of City of Shawnee for Annexation of LandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Smith v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. In Re Petition of City of Shawnee for Annexation of LandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API