Legal Opinion
Hohe v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 1989No. 88-5735PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s order of September 15, 1988 denying their motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). Since the plaintiffs have failed to show that they would suffer irreparable harm absent the issuance of a preliminary injunction, we will affirm.
We review the district court’s order under an abuse of discretion standard. Thus, its decision “must be affirmed unless ... [it] has abused its discretion, committed an obvious error in applying the law or made a serious mistake in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Campbell Soup Company v. Conagra, Inc. Sallie W. Rosenthal Conagra, Inc. And Sallie RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Opulent Life Church v. City of Holly SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- American Civil Liberties Union v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Legend Night Club v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.