Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The question in this appeal is whether an unincor*867porated association has capacity to take a bequest, either in its own right or as beneficiary of a* charitable trust.

Although issues were joined, at the trial the facts were agreed upon and dictated into the record, and so far as here necessary are stated. The last will of Sarah M. Simmons was admitted to probate August 22, 1932. Under its terms she made some specific bequests, which are not here involved. The residuary clause of the will recited:

“Item 5. All the rest and remainder of my…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kennett v. KiddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Treadwell v. BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Lehnherr v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Hollenbeck v. LyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Kennett v. KiddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Kroh Bros. DevelopmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. In Re Estate of FreshourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. In Re Estate of YetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Daughters of American Revolution v. Washburn CollegeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. UMB Bank, N.A. v. Kansas East Conference of United Methodist Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API