Legal Opinion
CompSource Oklahoma v. L & L Construction, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 7, 2008No. 105,629, 105,641. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Presiding Judge.
11 These consolidated appeals are before this Court on counter-motions for summary judgment filed as a consequence of Plaintiff/Appellant CompSource's (CompSource) Petition for Declaratory Judgment. 1 Comp-Source requested a determination that, as a matter of law, it did not have a duty to indemnify, defend, or compensate any of the Defendants because the Workers Compensation and Employers Liability policies issued by CompSource do not afford coverage for intentional torts as defined by Parret v. Unicco Service Company, 2005 OK 54, 127 P.3d 572.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- May v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Roberts v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Fry v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019