L.S. v. David Eschbach, Jr., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
We granted allowance of appeal in this matter to consider whether Section 1705 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1705, which restricts the recovery of individuals who have limited tort insurance coverage, applies not only to motor vehicle drivers and passengers, but also to pedestrians. A majority of the Superior Court determined that Section 1705 expressly precludes a pedestrian, who is insured by a limited tort automobile policy, from recovering noneconomic damages absent serious injury. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Kusza v. MaximonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. OstroskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MazzettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bennett v. MucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- City of Philadelphia v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- City of Philadelphia v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.