Legal Opinion
Doe v. Capital Cities
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1996No. B091857PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
An aspiring actor is first drugged and then gang-raped by a casting director and four other men one Sunday at the casting director’s home. Can the actor successfully allege causes of action for sexual harassment and negligent hiring against the casting director’s employers? The trial court ruled against the actor, sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. On this appeal, we analyze the allegations in the actor’s second amended complaint in light of pertinent statutory and decisional law and conclude that he has adequately pled a cause of action for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kelly-Zurian v. Wohl Shoe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Phillips v. TLC Plumbing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.