Legal Opinion
Kelly-Zurian v. Wohl Shoe Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1994No. Docket Nos. B054032, B054838PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
—Defendant and appellant Robert Lawicki (Lawicki) appeals a judgment entered upon a $125,000 jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and appellant Kathleen Joyce Kelly-Zurian (Zurian) in a sexual harassment case. Defendants and appellants Wohl Shoe Company, Shoe Company-Fanfares Shoes Division (Wohl), Lawicki’s former employer, separately appeal, contending Wohl is not liable for Lawicki’s conduct. Zurian also appeals, contending she is entitled to a new trial against Wohl on the issue of punitive damages.
The issues presented include an employer’s liability for sexual harassment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Fiol v. DoellstedtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.