Legal Opinion

Killian v. Millard

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1991No. A036176PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

A. Joseph Killian and Bruce Van Natta appeal from the order of the trial court voiding contracts they had entered into with persons not parties to their lawsuit and ordering them to repay with interest such money as they had received pursuant to those contracts. We will reverse the judgment, finding that the court had no power to void the agreements.

Killian and Van Natta (hereafter referred to as Syndicators) filed a complaint against William H. Millard et al. (Millard) alleging the breach of an agreement to transfer to Syndicators an interest in a corporation owned by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. William H. Raley Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Powers v. AshtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Mills Land & Water Co. v. Golden West Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. WINDHAM AT CARMEL MTN. RANCH ASSOCIATION v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. CENTER FOR SELF-IMPROVEMENT & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v. Lennar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API