Legal Opinion

Hill Bros. Chemical Co. v. Grandinetti

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 4, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 3801, 1 CA-CIV 3932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

This consolidated appeal illustrates some of the frustrating procedural problems that a contractor’s creditor may face in a race-to-judgment situation under A.R.S. § 32-1152 D. Western Casualty and Surety Company (Western Casualty) filed this interpleader action on August 24, 1976. Named as defendants were various creditors of Morley Swimming Pool Construction, Inc. (Morley). The defendants included the appellant, Hill Brothers Chemical Company (Hill Brothers), and the appellees in 1 CA-CIV 3801, who are referred to herein as Grandinetti and Encinas. Western…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Phoenix of Hartford, Inc. v. Harmony Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Baird-Gatzmer Corp. v. Henry Clay Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gieselmann v. StegemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. Husky v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Cas. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Pulaski v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. National Homes Corp. v. Totem Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Weitekamp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Wyatt v. WehmuellerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API