Legal Opinion
Blackwell v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Affirmed on authority of the principles announced in Hinnant v. R. R., 202 N. C., 489, 163 S. E., 555.
The case of Dickey v. R. R., 196 N. C., 726, 147 S. E., 15, is distinguishable in that the defendant’s train was there blocking the street in violation of a town ordinance.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Dickey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. SwindellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Morris v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965