Legal Opinion

Estate of Carl I. Heim, Deceased, Isabelle J. Heim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1990No. 89-70169PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief District Judge:

The estate appeals the Tax Court’s 1 determination that a bequest to Isabelle J. Heim, surviving spouse of the deceased, was a nondeductible terminable interest under section 2056 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.); that section 1036 of the California Probate Code did not apply to save the bequest from the terminable interest rules; and that the estate therefore was not entitled to a marital deduction. We affirm the decision of the Tax Court.

I. FACTS

On November 12, 1981, Carl I. Heim (hereinafter “Mr. Heim” or “decedent”) died testate, a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Rapp v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Texaco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Ralph H. Davis Evelyn Davis, Personal Representative v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Estate of Bond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. Creighton University v. KleinfeldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API