Creighton University v. Kleinfeld
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER *
BURRELL, District Judge.
Defendants Oscar Budd Kleinfeld and Kle-infeld & Heiser (collectively referenced as “Kleinfeld Defendants”) move for summary judgment, arguing that the pay-all-taxes clause in Blanche Kroloffs will did not exonerate the remainder beneficiaries to Yale Kroloffs qualified terminable interest prop erty (“QTIP”) trust from paying the federal taxes attributable to that trust. Further, defendants Mayall, Hurley, Knutsen, Smith & Green (“Mayall, Hurley”) and the Klein-feld Defendants 1 move for summary judgment, arguing they owed no duty to plaintiff Creighton…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noble v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Fabian v. LindsaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Fabian v. LindsaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014