Legal Opinion

Thompson Ramo Wooldridge Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 13, 1966No. 104-64PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks an equitable price adjustment under a supply contract with the Department of the Navy, and, alternatively, damages for breach of that contract. The claim is that the defendant breached a contractual warranty requiring it either to furnish microfilm suitable for use in performing or to grant a price increase if suitable microfilm were not supplied.

On May 10, 1957, the Bureau of Ships issued an Invitation for Bids for the production of thirty-six radio transmitters. 1 The bid schedule recited that the defendant would supply the successful bidder with three items of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Granite Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Haney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API