Legal Opinion

Aitken v. Southwest Finance Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1933No. Docket No. 4747PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The court below sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint, without leave to amend, and thereafter entered a judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff appeals, and the sole question is as to the sufficiency of the complaint.

Preliminarily it may be noted that the demurrer was both general and special; it may be further noted that no serious contention is made on the point that the court did not permit plaintiff to further amend.

Appellant states in his brief that the action was brought for the recovery of interest and penalties under the Usury Law;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ames v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cobb v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wooton v. CoerberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Ferdon v. Zarriello Bros. Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Ortiz v. American RailroadSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API