Legal Opinion

B. Elmer Moore v. The Home Insurance Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1979No. CA 77-2045PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

B. Elmer Moore challenges the termination of his employment by The Home Insurance Company (“the company”). He contends that he had been discharged in violation of his employment contract. He seeks recovery of employer pension contributions and for equitable relief. The district court granted the company’s motion for summary judgment on all claims. We affirm.

Our review is to ascertain whether there were any genuine issues of material fact that would preclude summary judgment. Accepting Moore’s view of the facts, we must determine whether there is sufficient…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  4. Larsen v. Motor Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gordon v. Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API