Legal Opinion

Van Bokkelen v. Travelers' Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This is a submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts, and the question presented is as to the liability of the defend*400ant under a' policy of insurance by which the defendant agreed to insure one Spencer D. C. Van Bokkelen against injuries resulting “ through external, violent, arid accidental means,” and which provided that if “ death results from such injuries alone, within ninety days will pay ten thousand dollars to Caroline B. Van Bokkelen, his daughter,” with the further provision that “ if such injuries are sustained while riding as a passenger in ariy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schoonmaker v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Northrup v. . the Railway Passenger As. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. London Assurance Corp. v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sant v. Continental Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Weil v. Globe Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Depue v. Travelers' Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RustTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API